|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on May 28, 2013 17:47:42 GMT -5
They'rrrrrrre commmmming.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on May 30, 2013 17:28:28 GMT -5
EW&S - Driver of the # 19 Look it up.... norcal4cycle.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=kc&action=display&thread=421GVI - Driver of the # 19. Left the emergency brake on while driving to dinner resulting in the emergency evacuation of all passengers. ITM - Driver of the # 90 on the driver of the #87 who at the time of the incident was in a podium position. WED - TWO COUNTS! Driver of the # 19 borrowed the driver of the #9's drain pan to catch his gas while draining his float bowl. Apparently he didn't want a repeat of the incident in Atwater last year where he spilled gas all over the place. So far so good....right up until the point he intentionally poured the gas in the dirt NEXT to the asphalt.   Count two - After receiving a bunch of "WTF are you doing" looks for the "pour incident", the next time he drained his float, the driver of the #19 intentionally left the left the drain pan out so it would allow the gas to evaporate rather than dispose of it properly as the rest of the NFRA does. Apparently, air pollution is somehow preferable to ground pollution in the #19's mind. GVI AND CHP Driver of the #19. The 19 and 9 were headed out for a practice run when the driver of the #19 started driving "crazy". The #19 went back to his pit and the #9 proceeded with practice. Upon returning to pits, the #9 found the driver of the #19 and a couple of shifter pilots (Steve and Jeremy) starting at the 19's motor. The look on their faces was grim. The motor had been partially torn down and the shifter guys advocated a full tear down and inspection. When the driver of the #9 inquired what the problem was he was advised the motor just wouldn't go. Being the mechanical genius he is, the driver of the #9 asked, "ahhhh is the choke on?" The look on the face of the driver of the #19 answered the question. Normally you can only be charged with one infraction per "incident". However, due to the fact that the shifter group was involved in this incident the driver of the #19 managed to bring shame and ridicule to the entire NFRA organization. Therefore, it is recommended that this count be tried with the "Special Circumstances" provision of the Kangaroo Court (don't bother looking it up, it's all double-secret). The special circumstances provide that a defendant can be guilty of multiple charges for a single incident. If any case, in the history of the court warrants special circumstances, this is it! (although Terry's kart driving itself off into the wild blue yonder of Reno should have as well ;D)
|
|
|
|
Post by ron90 on May 30, 2013 17:58:36 GMT -5
Masn the rule gets change, and the charge gets posted. I think the #19 kart is going to out charge me. |
|
|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on May 30, 2013 18:32:05 GMT -5
Masn the rule gets change, and the charge gets posted. I think the #19 kart is going to out charge me. The court has been considering that charge for over a year. Given the events at Atwater the court had no choice other than implement it. As mentioned in a prior post, my charges have been on hold until I saw that it had become official. Today I noticed it on the KC page and was then able to submit my charges. |
|
|
|
Post by norcalacr on May 31, 2013 9:52:45 GMT -5
Please accept my affidavit as I am unable to attend in person.
Guilty (times 7)
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Pell on May 31, 2013 18:48:28 GMT -5
Guys, great dialog, and oh so funny, cause you can't make this stuff up!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on Jun 1, 2013 12:11:35 GMT -5
All charges from Atwater have been continued and will be heard at the 6-30-13 race at PC.
|
|
|
|
Post by ron90 on Jun 1, 2013 22:53:19 GMT -5
All charges from Atwater have been continued and will be heard at the 6-30-13 race at PC. They were continued without fully advising the NFRA members in attendance at teh Reno race.  I objected vehemently, but was simply ignored. As usual.  |
|
|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on Jun 4, 2013 19:37:18 GMT -5
All charges from Atwater have been continued and will be heard at the 6-30-13 race at PC. They were continued without fully advising the NFRA members in attendance at the Reno race. I objected vehemently, but was simply ignored. As usual. Ron, the majority of members in attendance at the Reno race voted on this and it was approved. You weren't consulted simply because we are looking out for you. Basically we were trying to protect you from yourself since you would have most likely gotten a EW&S charge because, well, ya know how you are. ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by Brad Wunder on Jul 1, 2013 17:29:22 GMT -5
Results of the Kangaroo Court this weekend at PC.... EW&S - Driver of the # 19 Look it up.... norcal4cycle.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=kc&action=display&thread=421GUILTY!GVI - Driver of the # 19. Left the emergency brake on while driving to dinner resulting in the emergency evacuation of all passengers. Initially the defendant was found not guilty. However, after reviewing the affidavits the jury was deadlock which automatically results in a GUILTY finding.ITM - Driver of the # 90 on the driver of the #87 who at the time of the incident was in a podium position. GUILTYWED - TWO COUNTS! Driver of the # 19 borrowed the driver of the #9's drain pan to catch his gas while draining his float bowl. Apparently he didn't want a repeat of the incident in Atwater last year where he spilled gas all over the place. So far so good....right up until the point he intentionally poured the gas in the dirt NEXT to the asphalt. not guilty.....total BSCount two - After receiving a bunch of "WTF are you doing" looks for the "pour incident", the next time he drained his float, the driver of the #19 intentionally left the left the drain pan out so it would allow the gas to evaporate rather than dispose of it properly as the rest of the NFRA does. Apparently, air pollution is somehow preferable to ground pollution in the #19's mind. GUILTY!GVI AND CHP Driver of the #19. The 19 and 9 were headed out for a practice run when the driver of the #19 started driving "crazy". The #19 went back to his pit and the #9 proceeded with practice. Upon returning to pits, the #9 found the driver of the #19 and a couple of shifter pilots (Steve and Jeremy) starting at the 19's motor. The look on their faces was grim. The motor had been partially torn down and the shifter guys advocated a full tear down and inspection. When the driver of the #9 inquired what the problem was he was advised the motor just wouldn't go. Being the mechanical genius he is, the driver of the #9 asked, "ahhhh is the choke on?" The look on the face of the driver of the #19 answered the question. Normally you can only be charged with one infraction per "incident". However, due to the fact that the shifter group was involved in this incident the driver of the #19 managed to bring shame and ridicule to the entire NFRA organization. Therefore, it is recommended that this count be tried with the "Special Circumstances" provision of the Kangaroo Court (don't bother looking it up, it's all double-secret). The special circumstances provide that a defendant can be guilty of multiple charges for a single incident. If any case, in the history of the court warrants special circumstances, this is it! (although Terry's kart driving itself off into the wild blue yonder of Reno should have as well ;D) GUILTY on BOTH charges |
|
|
|
Post by ron90 on Jul 1, 2013 23:14:00 GMT -5
Please accept my affidavit as I am unable to attend in person. Guilty (times 7) Let it be pubicly known that the Court originally found the Defendants Not Guilty on many of the Charges, including the charge against #90. However, in the interest of justice, and so as not to create a travesty of our KC system, I reminded the inebriated sitting judge/prosecutor that the aforementioned vote of "Guilty (times 7)" had been lodged with the Court. The judge/prosecutor stated ""Whatttttt." Oh, yeahhh!!! (With a slur in his speech). Hung juries were then found on the charges and the inebriated judge then stated "guilty". Apparently in "his" world a hung jury is as good as guilty. Go figure. I guess I need to brush up on my KC legal manuals. At least I don't think I did anything wrong at PC. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Roo on Jul 5, 2013 11:34:20 GMT -5
However, in the interest of justice, and so as not to create a travesty of our KC system... You are commended for your ethical standards. Bravo! ...I reminded the inebriated sitting judge/prosecutor... The judge/prosecutor stated ""Whatttttt." Oh, yeahhh!!! (With a slur in his speech). Hung juries were then found on the charges and the inebriated judge then stated "guilty". Apparently in "his" world a hung jury is as good as guilty. Go figure. I guess I need to brush up on my KC legal manuals. Careful Mr. You are dangerously close to contempt of court with your slanderous and inflammatory comments. Your status has been increased from double secret probation to TRIPLE secret probation. PERHAPS you should avail yourself of NFRA Kangaroo Court legal clinic so you can save yourself some embarrassment? For the very minor cost of $1599 we offer a two-day course on the ins and outs of the KC. As a practicing attorney you may want to plan on 3 days since you obviously have a lot of "law" that needs to be "unlearned". |
|
I objected vehemently, but was simply ignored. As usual. 
