Post by Simon on Jul 4, 2013 12:09:06 GMT -5
As the most recent sitting of the KC has shown, the jurors verdicts can sometime be hard to understand and seem to defy logic. It has become apparent that there are ways in which the jurors can be influenced to the benefit of the defendant. For instance, the #47, who usually likes to find everyone guilty and pushes for a ‘major’ in all cases was unusually lenient in the most recent KC sitting at Prarie City.
Consider the #19’s WED charge for dumping gas into the subsoil of Atwater … not guilty says #47 ! How can this be ? The answer was there for all to see on the top of the #47’s motor ….. brand new shiny exhaust nuts, drilled for safety wire to prevent them ever backing out at the incredible speeds the #47 typically attains on the track. Where did these marvels of engineering come from ? Kindly provided by the driver of the #19 earlier in the day.
Also consider the charge of ITM against the driver of #90. Despite the video evidence (which incidentally should NEVER be trusted knowing the publishers mastery of digital forging and manipulation) the #47 again voted not guilty. What gives ? Usually the #47 would be pressing for the most severe sentence to maintain the impeccable record of clean and courteous driving for which the NFRA has become renowned throughout the world. (I have it on good authority the FIA often use the “what would the NFRA kangaroo court do?” method of evaluating racing infractions at F1 races to come up with fair penalties for incidents in F1 races.) So, how could #90 possibly be not guilty ? Again, the reason was there for all to see on the #47’s toolbox …. a very nice jet holding gizmo to keep the #47’s jet organized and optimized to aid the quick carb fine tuning that creates the incredible speeds reference above. Where did this marvelous device come from ? Kindly provided by the driver of the #90 earlier in the day.
I hope you are all seeing a pattern here. This behavior is absolutely something I condone and encourage. It benefits me as well as following the slightly perverse nature of the kangaroo court, please let this continue unabated.
Consider the #19’s WED charge for dumping gas into the subsoil of Atwater … not guilty says #47 ! How can this be ? The answer was there for all to see on the top of the #47’s motor ….. brand new shiny exhaust nuts, drilled for safety wire to prevent them ever backing out at the incredible speeds the #47 typically attains on the track. Where did these marvels of engineering come from ? Kindly provided by the driver of the #19 earlier in the day.
Also consider the charge of ITM against the driver of #90. Despite the video evidence (which incidentally should NEVER be trusted knowing the publishers mastery of digital forging and manipulation) the #47 again voted not guilty. What gives ? Usually the #47 would be pressing for the most severe sentence to maintain the impeccable record of clean and courteous driving for which the NFRA has become renowned throughout the world. (I have it on good authority the FIA often use the “what would the NFRA kangaroo court do?” method of evaluating racing infractions at F1 races to come up with fair penalties for incidents in F1 races.) So, how could #90 possibly be not guilty ? Again, the reason was there for all to see on the #47’s toolbox …. a very nice jet holding gizmo to keep the #47’s jet organized and optimized to aid the quick carb fine tuning that creates the incredible speeds reference above. Where did this marvelous device come from ? Kindly provided by the driver of the #90 earlier in the day.
I hope you are all seeing a pattern here. This behavior is absolutely something I condone and encourage. It benefits me as well as following the slightly perverse nature of the kangaroo court, please let this continue unabated.
